Posted by
Justin Haskins on Monday, March 24, 2008 3:35:40 PM
It has become increasingly more clear over time that Barack Obama is going to be the DNC nominee for the 2008 general election. I still feel, despite the recent troubles encountered by Obama, that Hillary Clinton cannot justify stealing the nomination away. This is actually a good things for conservatives, because I truly believe there is no way in God's creation that Obama can beat McCain.
However, let us imagine for just a moment a world where Barack Obama wins. What are the implications of this? What exactly is Barack Obama all about? Most importantly, is Barack Hussein Obama a racist?
Before we can enter into that conversation, the comments of Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama's personal pastor and "spiritual guide" for the last 23 years, must be examined. The church Obama has tied himself to must be examined as well. Beyond all of this, we must determine the character of Barack Obama in a way that uses fact and not rumor or hatred.
First, let's look at Jeremiah Wright. Of course, by now, you have heard the comments that have become incredibly controversial, but they need to be examined again with the most troubling aspects highlighted.
The following is an analysis of Jeremiah Wright's comments:
“In the 21st century, white America got a wake-up call after 9/11/01. White America and the western world came to realize that people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just ‘disappeared’ as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring black concerns.” Jeremiah Wright (magazine article)
“Racism is how this country was founded and how this country is still run!…We [in the U.S.] believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.”
“The Israelis have illegally occupied Palestinian territories for over 40 years now. Divestment has now hit the table again as a strategy to wake the business community and wake up Americans concerning the injustice and the racism under which the Palestinians have lived because of Zionism.”
These comments, more so than any others (except perhaps "God Damn America"), are particularly reprehensible. The meaning behind these statements are not merely political opinions of the radical sort, like we have seen many times before from Wright and others. The comments listed above are filled with racism, hate, and anger.
For all of those who refuse to accept that Wright's comments are racist, notice how he continuously blames "white" Americans. Unlike other quotes where he speaks exclusively about rich white Americans or the government, Wright chooses to emphasize "white people" in these quotes. Wright, who has been known to associate with numerous anti-semites, has continuously made statements implying or bluntly calling Jews in Israel terrorists of the state-sponsored variety.
We have all heard comments from Wright before and we know now how radical he is, none of this is new information. What is new, however, is that Barack Obama was required when joing Trinity United to sign a document declaring his faith and beliefs in the "black values system". Within this system, includes the teaching of "black liberation theology" as taught by Dr. Jeremiah Wright and James Cone.
In an interview with Sean Hannity on the FoxNews show Hannity and Colmes, Hannity asked a series of questions to Dr. Wright beginning with, "It says, 'Commitment to God.' By the way, I'm with you, and I hope you'll pray for me, Reverend. Commitment to the black community, commitment to the black family, adherence to the black work ethic. It goes on, pledge, you know, acquired skills available to the black community, strengthening and supporting black institutions, pledging allegiance to all black leadership who have embraced the black value system, personal commitment to the embracement of the black value system. Now, Reverend, if every time we said black, if there was a church and those words were white, wouldn't we call that church racist?"
Dr. Wright responded, "No, we would call it Christianity. We've been saying that since there was a white Christianity; we've been saying that ever since white Christians took part in the slave trade; we've been saying that ever since they had churches in slave castles. We don't have to say the word "white." We just have to live in white America, the United States of white America. That's not the issue; you're missing the issue. As I was trying to say to you, liberation theology...If you're not going to talk about theology in context, if you're not going to talk about liberation theology that came out of the ‘60s, black liberation theology, that started with Jim Cone in 1968, and the writings of Cone, and the writings of Dwight Hopkins, and the writings of womanist theologians, and Asian theologians, and Hispanic theologians...then you can talk about the black values system."
So then, let's look at Jim Cone and see what he has to say about "black liberation theology" and white America. In his book entitled Black
Theology and Black Power, James Cone stated that
"Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community. . . . Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love."
These kinds of ideas are dangerous for the future of America. Barack Obama signed onto them, maybe not specifically, but he did agree to the general concept of this "black liberation theology". This concept is scary. Even if Obama is nowhere near as radical as he is currently looking to most white Americans, Obama has proven terrible judgement by maintaining this ridiculous relationship with Jeremiah Wright and "black liberation theology". What kind of leadership has all of this proven?
Obama, just a few days ago, gave a very well-spoken speech regarding race. Some of his points were valid but he never truly denounced the behavior, nor did he acknowledge it was a poor choice. Instead he masked his mistakes and poor judgement in the name of "talking about race". It seems to me in all of these stories that the racists are these African-Americans denouncing all white people, not whites. What is there to say? Why is it that we are having a speech about white and black racism when the comments made, the issue being discussed, and the dilemna former supports of Obama are facing are all apart of an African-American racism problem? Are there white racists in this country? Yes! Is that wrong? Yes! Should it be reformed? Of course. But, how and why is the focus of racism being tilted to white Americans?
In addition to this, it has come to my attention that I do not believe Obama can win in the general election now regardless of what happens!
I have analyzed the 2004 election results, various polls regarding the current candidates, and the trends of past elections as well. Using this data, I believe it is clear that Barack Obama cannot win.
Based on current polls and the 2004elections results, only five states will end up resulting as "close" between McCain and Obama, who I believe has sealed up his nomination. (There is no way in my mind that Barack Obama will be denied his nomination given that he is black and that would not bode well for the Democrats in this election and within their Ivy League/New York Times circles.....
The five states are, as you know, Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Iowa, and New Hampshire.
George Bush won the last election with a total of 286 electoral votes compared to Kerry's 252. Of the five close states mentioned above, Florida, Iowa, and Ohio are the only states that Bush and the Republicans won.
Perhaps the most important factor in the 2008 election is that Barack Obama cannot win in Florida. Florida was carried by Bush at a not-so-close margin of 5%last time around. Things have certainly changed throughout the country since, but Barack Obama has a great deal of trouble carrying Latinos and you cannot win as a Democrat in Florida unless you carry Latinos at a very high margin. Broward County, the most important county for Democrats in Florida is predominantly Latino. In addition to this, McCain, who has supported amnesty for many Latinos, has a good chance of luring many Latinos away from Obama. Racial tensions also play an important role in this; Latinos and African-Americans have significant problems between the two of them within low income communities.(Broward County's Latinos live mostly in low-income to low middle income areas)That fact, combined with Obama's inability to win over Clinton in the state....and the Jeremiah Wright comments, leads me to believe that Florida is completely out of the picture. If that is so, then that means that the democrats need to make up the 18 electoral votes they were short of in 2004. The following scenarios are the only way in which they can accomplish this feat:
1. Democrats win Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire. The current Wright comments hurt Obama tremendously in a state like Ohio and New Hampshire, where there are a large number of middle class Americans. This would give the Democrats an electoral win of 272 to 266
2. Democrats win Ohio, Iowa, and Pennsylvania, lose New Hampshire. This would give the Democrats a victory as follows: 275 to 263.These are really the only possible scenarios for winning. The Republicans, and McCain by extension, only need to do the following:
1. Win Ohio. If Ohio goes Republican, the Democrats cannot win regardless of what happens in New Hampshire, Iowa, and Pennsylvania. If the Republicans win Ohio and lose Iowa, New Hampshire, and Pennsylvania, McCain would still win 279 to 259.
2. Republicans win Pennsylvania. If McCain wins Pennsylvania, it doesn't matter if he loses Ohio, New Hampshire, and Iowa. He would still win at a count of 278 to 260.
3. McCain loses Ohio, loses Pennsylvania (Something that could very well happen) but he wins Florida, Iowa, and New Hampshire. In this scenario, John McCain would win 270 to 268....and this is a very possible situation.
My conclusion regarding these races is clear; there is no way in my mind Barack Obama can win. There are far more ways McCain can win and his ability, whether conservatives like it or not, to bring liberals onto his side, makes him a formidable opponent. I do believe it is very possible we could se another election where the Republican wins in the electoral college and loses in the popular vote...Personally, I believe the count will be 279 to 259. I believe the Republicans will lose Iowa and will maintain Ohio...The election could end where the election began, in my home state of New Hampshire.
I'd like to thank Crawfish, from Crawfish's Swamp for pointing out some of the information regarding James Cone!
Justin Haskins
Author, Saving America: From Global Warming to Immigration